Elijahovah

2008-02-25 23:38:15 UTC

Permalink

Ashurbanipal 21 years 670-649 BCRaw Message

Ashur-itillu-illani 4 years 649-645 BC

Nabopolassar 21 years 645-624 BC

Nebuchanezzar coronation 625 BC

Nebuchadnezzar 43 years 624-581 BC

Evil-Merodach 22 years 582-560 BC

in absentee of Nebuchadnezzar 7 years 582-575 BC

coregent for Nebuchadnezzar's return 12th year 575-563 BC (Polyhister)

His total rule for Nebuchadnezzar 18 years 582-564 BC (Josephus)

(confusion later is eliminated by deleting one 19-year cycle of lunar

dates)

This is done by regarding these 19 years

as Nebuchadnezzar's years 25-43 instead of as 44-62.

In record should we expect to find tablets of 1 thru 19 of Evil-Marduk

or would they be labeled as 1 thru 19 in name of Nebuchadnezzar

(absent).

Evil-Merodach (sole rule) 2 years 563-561 BC

Neriglissar 4 years 560-556 BC

Labashi-Marduk (9 months) 557-556 BC

Nabonidus 17 years 556-539 BC

This 19-year shift goes back to an Era of Samaria being

740 BC Era claimed as a 721 BC Era. The year 740 BC is Tamuz.

362 orbits of Mars as 773 Julian years

It is 773 years after exodus world disaster in1513 BC

just as Israel division 997 BC is 773 years after 1770 BC

Nimrod's death when baby Judah was born in Syria.

Nimrod is not Ninus, Nimrod lived 500 (2270-1770 BC) while Ninus

was a king 600 years after Shem Melchizedek's death in 1868 BC.

The 600-year Venus is called Semiramis from 1867-1267 BC when Ninus

rebuilt Nineveh.

However, Tamuz which is Mars (Damuzi) is the lunar month of July

when Mars was observed in 1770 BC and 997 BC. So thinking that

Tamuz is the 19 year moon subtract 19 years after 740 BC and you have

721 BC for Samaria instead of 740 BC.

Now the mistake was to think that this meant Senacharib honored

himself upon

the 740 BC Era and it got mistaken as 721 BC, however the Greek Era

776 BC

calculated as Ur was the Era he used not 721 BC, so the error between

the

776 BC and the scholastic 722 BC is 54 years all the way back to 1594

BC

when Babylon fell.