Someone tell MT:

[JTEM]

The dinosaurs were NOT warm blooded.

[Roger Bagula]

JTEM,
That's the very old doctrine not based on current findings that
some dinosaur may have been warm blooded and bird-like.
You just refuse to learn or stay current.
You probably still believe in Clovis first as well?
It's one reason you are a cultural dinosaur...
Roger

Post by JTEM
The dinosaurs were NOT warm blooded.

[JTEM]

Post by Roger Bagula
That's the very old doctrine not based on current findings
that some dinosaur may have been warm blooded and
bird-like.

Slight pause here...

Either all members of the set "dinosaurs" were warm
blooded, or the statement "the dinosaurs were warm
blooded" is false.

Conversely, the statement "the dinosaurs were not
warm blooded" is true, as the set "dinosaurs" includes
as many or more members who would not be warm
blooded as those who we think were.

Post by Roger Bagula
You just refuse to learn or stay current.

You're not paying attention.

Post by Roger Bagula
You probably still believe in Clovis first as well?

Depends. Are we speaking of people or a culture?
Seems to me that pre-Clovis people are a footnote
at best, while a pre-Clovis culture is still little more
than faint speculation.

[Roger Bagula]

JTEM,
No it is you who aren't paying attention!
Your attempt at deductive logic in
an inductive logic area is pretty laughable.
Try "dinosaurs" is a generic term
for animals of many ages of geological eras.
They evolved with time until about 96 million years ago when the comet
hit off Yucatan ...
Some of the later versions were demonstrably different.
They just ( new news this month) found some fossils with bone marrow
dna that is intact.
They are in the process of sequencing it at this very moment.
Roger

Post by JTEM

Post by Roger Bagula
That's the very old doctrine not based on current findings
that some dinosaur may have been warm blooded and
bird-like.

Slight pause here...
Either all members of the set "dinosaurs" were warm
blooded, or the statement "the dinosaurs were warm
blooded" is false.
Conversely, the statement "the dinosaurs were not
warm blooded" is true, as the set "dinosaurs" includes
as many or more members who would not be warm
blooded as those who we think were.

Post by Roger Bagula
You just refuse to learn or stay current.

You're not paying attention.

Post by Roger Bagula
You probably still believe in Clovis first as well?

Depends. Are we speaking of people or a culture?
Seems to me that pre-Clovis people are a footnote
at best, while a pre-Clovis culture is still little more
than faint speculation.

[Roger Bagula]

Better switch from "easy" mode
or I will really humiliate you!

Post by JTEM

Post by Roger Bagula
That's the very old doctrine not based on current findings
that some dinosaur may have been warm blooded and
bird-like.

Slight pause here...
Either all members of the set "dinosaurs" were warm
blooded, or the statement "the dinosaurs were warm
blooded" is false.
Conversely, the statement "the dinosaurs were not
warm blooded" is true, as the set "dinosaurs" includes
as many or more members who would not be warm
blooded as those who we think were.

Post by Roger Bagula
You just refuse to learn or stay current.

You're not paying attention.

Post by Roger Bagula
You probably still believe in Clovis first as well?

Depends. Are we speaking of people or a culture?
Seems to me that pre-Clovis people are a footnote
at best, while a pre-Clovis culture is still little more
than faint speculation.

[JTEM]

Post by Roger Bagula
Better switch from "easy" mode
or I will really humiliate you!

A fact that if not made obvious by your top-posting
is certainly revealed by your insisting on
responding twice to the same article... which, of
course, makes you twice as clever.

I'm in awe.

[Roger Bagula]

JTEM
It is clear that you would benefit by thinking twice!
Roger

Post by JTEM

Post by Roger Bagula
Better switch from "easy" mode
or I will really humiliate you!

A fact that if not made obvious by your top-posting
is certainly revealed by your insisting on
responding twice to the same article... which, of
course, makes you twice as clever.
I'm in awe.