dolf
2019-04-14 06:10:21 UTC
— ARE THE VEGAN #419 - PROTESTS AN ASYMMETRICAL GLOBALIST MOVEMENT
PROPAGANDISED BY INTEGRAL WORLD WHICH IS INTENTIONED ON DESTABILISING
SOVEREIGN NATIONS?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April, 2019
The following statement made within an interview of Frank Visser by a
vegan neo-Nazi David Long is entirely false as an act of public
deception due to the circumstance that an Intellectual Categorical
Imperative (ie. 4 quadrants) within an eight tier transformational
process of #312 - CONTRADICTION (ie. How else might it differentiate
reality) is reliant upon a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL so as to then
maintain its acceptable #81 - ORDER OF THINGS and therefore is
implicitly antagonistic towards the SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE as
the sapient dignity of the person.
WHAT DO YOU SAY TO PEOPLE WHO SAY INTEGRAL WORLD IS NOT THE #311 - HOME
OF GOOD CRITICISM?
I think that's a very easy dismissal itself. If this forum has been
alive for twenty years, and has been for a long time the only online
forum to seriously discuss these ideas, what you can expect is a great
variety of quality of submissions to that forum, but for sure there have
been some valid ideas that have been expressed. Even a whole book, by
Jeff Meyerhoff, has been published on that website and I hope my
contributions also count as valid criticism, so I really don't know what
to say about these kinds of responses. Because you can use that argument
until the *COW* {ie.
8 APRIL 2018
AS DATE OF VEGAN PROTESTERS UNAPOLOGETIC FOR MELBOURNE'S PEAK-HOUR
CHAOS, ABATTOIR BLOCKADES
<https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/vegan-protesters-unapologetic-for-melbourne-s-peak-hour-chaos-abattoir-blockades-20190408-p51by5.html>
H1241@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 10 (#24); Ego: 2 (#10),
@4: Sup: 29 (#53); Ego: 19 (#29),
@5: Sup: 67 (#120); Ego: 38 (#67),
@6: Sup: 36 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 50 (#117),
@7: Sup: 42 (#198); Ego: 6 (#123),
Male: #198; Feme: #123
} // #36
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #302 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; I am not a land-grabber.
#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), daily increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #14
#302 as [#2, #100, #200] / #366 as [#6, #2, #2, #100, #200, #50, #6] =
bâqâr (H1241): {UMBRA: #0 as #302 % #41 = #15} 1) cattle, herd, oxen,
ox; 1a) cattle (generic pl. but sing. in form - coll); 1b) herd
(particular one); 1c) head of cattle (individually);
} come #311 - *HOME*, and you are really neck-deep into your ideology,
but you really need to engage your criticism to avoid that #302 -
*DANGER*." [<http://www.integralworld.net/long2.html>]
That any dialogue which doesn’t deploy their semantics of opportunity is
then subject to scorn, censorship and isolationism and by such actions
does not convey any intellectual integrity and fails to foster honest
enquiry.
Nous: #12
Time: 01:15 hrs
Date: 2019.4.8
Torah: [#70, #30, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 59 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 40 (#140 -
I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #148; Feme: #140
} // #140
Dao: Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire
Tetra: #25 - Contention
I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit
Latin: Altissimus {Hidden God; cf: high; deep/profound; shrill; lofty,
noble; deep rooted; far-fetched; grown great (Vulgate [Psalms 45:7])}
Alt: Amamyah {Join with God} {
1. HELPS AGAINST SPIRITUAL TORMENT & REVEALS TRAITORS
2. SEA VOYAGES
3. OF DISCOVERIES
4. Senacher , Sennacherib {bramble; thistle}
}
Solar Eclipse: 27 February 1998 (AEST)
Solar Eclipse: 8 April 2005 (AEST)
Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively a chamber or dwelling:-nest,
room), buyer; owner}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#427 / #366} / HETEROS {#455 / #380} / TORAH {#461
/ #383}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:6,nous:12&lexicon:H1241>
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2019.4.8, Time: 01:15
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]
*THAT* *THE* *POSTER* {:-]))) <***@wuji.net> IS ENGAGING IN SUBTERFUGE
AND OUGHT TO BE PLACED ON A TERRORIST WATCH LIST...
BUDGIE TALK: "How have u been?"
MOI: "I have a headache at present...
But otherwise very happy with the world since I sunk an attempt by others:
#273 - REASON (FORMULA FOR PRESERVATION OF EUROPEAN AUTONOMY)
#302 - TRAP / JUXTAPOSITION
#362 - MOUSE
(An unusual triangulation of three numbers given by my intellectual
property as actions others were publicly engaged)
To override our nation’s sovereignty which was associated with the
toilet defamation on 28 October 2017 when I gave a carpe diem against
the local RSL / Catholic / Knights Templars International whom were up
to no good...
A year later I had an improper attempted delivery of toilet blocks to my
home address ...
YOUTUBE: "Flushed Away (Trailer)"
I will win my court case
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#362 / #302} / HETEROS {#331 / #327} / TORAH {#406
/ #324}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/grumble.html?zen:1,row:6,col:1,nous:60&lexicon:G3850>
***@zen: 1, row: 6, col: 1, nous: 60 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #362 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15
- Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small, Ego: #302 / #60 - Skill
Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15 - Modesty, Humbling;
Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small]
G3850@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 22 (#222); Ego: 2 (#103),
@6: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 70 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
@7: Sup: 41 (#274); Ego: 30 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#323); Ego: 8 (#211),
@9: Sup: 59 (#382); Ego: 10 (#221),
Male: #382; Feme: #221
} // #302
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115 <--- *DIGNITY * ROYAL*
#302 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #70, #30, #8, #10] = parabolḗ (G3850):
{UMBRA: #79 as #292 % #41 = #5} 1) *A* *PLACING* *OF* *ONE* *THING* *BY*
*THE* *SIDE* *OF* *ANOTHER*, *JUXTAPOSITION*, as of ships in battle; 2)
metaph.; 2a) a comparing, comparison of one thing with another,
likeness, similitude; 2b) an example by which a doctrine or precept is
illustrated; 2c) *A* *NARRATIVE*, *FICTITIOUS* *BUT* *AGREEABLE* *TO*
*THE* *LAWS* *AND* *USAGES* *OF* *HUMAN* *LIFE*, by which either the
duties of men or the things of God, particularly the nature and history
of God's kingdom are figuratively portrayed; 2d) *A* *PARABLE*: *AN*
*EARTHLY* *STORY* *WITH* *A* *HEAVENLY* *MEANING*; 3) a pithy and
instructive saying, involving some likeness or comparison and having
preceptive or admonitory force; 3a) an aphorism, a maxim; 4) a proverb;
5) *AN* *ACT* *BY* *WHICH* *ONE* *EXPOSES* *HIMSELF* *OR* *HIS*
*POSSESSIONS* *TO* *DANGER*, *A* *VENTURE*, *A* *RISK*;
"Therefore- speak I to them in parables-G3850: because they seeing see
not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand." [Matthew 13:13]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Potty%20Mouth.pdf>
EGGIE (***@KROTEKO.COM) @ 0201 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "WHY
BELIEVE SCIENCE WHEN YOU CAN BELIEVE TRUMP?
I believe everything Trump says. I don't believe anything scientists say.
Trump will make me grate.
No education is required to believe Trump. Everything he says is simple."
DOLF @ 0519 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "
— GNOSIS OSMOSIS —
“REGGIE THE VEGGIE
TRIES TO BE RECUSED.
OF A NAZI IDENTITY.
BUT AS MEATHEAD.
A PARADING VEGAN. {@334 - PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS
(Critique, pp. 341 ff.)}
BY A FLAP IS FIXATED.
HE’S A CHEESY BOGAN.
THAT’S EMANCIPATED.”
<https://www.facebook.com/125982670754724/posts/2268673266485643/>

<Loading Image...
>
[SBS NEWS @ 1500 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: Veganism is growing in
popularity – will it eventually become the norm?]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS: @334: It has long
been observed that in all substances the true subject – namely that
which remains after all accidents (as predicates) have been removed –
and hence the substantial itself, is unknown to us; and various
complaints have been made about these limits to our insight. But it
needs to be said that human understanding is not to be blamed because it
does not know the substantial in things, i.e., cannot determine it by
itself, but rather because it wants to cognize determinately, like an
object that is given, what is only an idea. Pure reason demands that for
each predicate of a thing we should seek its appropriate subject, but
that for this subject, which is in turn necessarily only a predicate, we
should seek its subject again, and so forth to infinity (or as far as we
get). But from this it follows that we should take nothing that we can
attain for a final subject, and that the substantial itself could never
be thought by our ever-so-deeply penetrating understanding, even if
*THE* *WHOLE* *OF* *NATURE* *WERE* *LAID* *BARE* *BEFORE* *IT*; for the
specific nature of our understanding consists in thinking everything
discursively, i.e., through concepts, hence through mere predicates,
among which the absolute subject must therefore always be absent.
Consequently, *ALL* *REAL* *PROPERTIES* *BY* *WHICH* *WE* *COGNIZE*
*BODIES* *ARE* *MERE* *ACCIDENTS* *FOR* *WHICH* *WE* *LACK* *A*
*SUBJECT* – *EVEN* *IMPENETRABILITY*, *WHICH* *MUST* *ALWAYS* *BE*
*CONCEIVED* *ONLY* *AS* *THE* *EFFECT* *OF* *A* *FORCE*." [Page 85, 86]
Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of this
PARIS RIOTS picture (shown above) as presumably an Islamic binomial
mindset of an unreasoned methodology yet presumptuously claiming to
dictate peace as conveying circularity of #492 - AUTONOMOUS VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL (ie. either Liberty / Egalitarian depending upon the nuance) in
being paradoxically entirely of a trinomial providence:
MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
DOLF @ 1528 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "We see from another poster's
unreasoned and pejorative response just how true and self satisfying a
contempt by ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL can really be and
especially so within a herd mentality where a foolsome dignity is
bestowed by a common consensus but doesn't have sufficient sensibility
excepting its own self-entitlement by which it engorges itself within a
hedonistic lustful *FRAUDULENT* indecency that it's opine is worth
something more than a *RAZOO* ...
[F, {@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6)}
i, {@2: Sup: 15 (#21); Ego: 9 (#15)}
x, {@3: Sup: 48 (#69); Ego: 33 (#48)}
e, {@4: Sup: 53 (#122); Ego: 5 (#53)}
d, {@5: Sup: 57 (#179); Ego: 4 (#57)}
i, {@6: Sup: 66 (#245); Ego: 9 (#66)}
t, {@7: Sup: 23 (#268); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})}
f, {@8: Sup: 29 (#297); Ego: 6 (#110)}
o, {@9: Sup: 8 (#305); Ego: 60 (#170)}
r, {@10: Sup: 17 (#322); Ego: 9 (#179)}
y, {@11: Sup: 69 (#391 ***); Ego: 52 (#231 ***)}
o, {@12: Sup: 48 (#439); Ego: 60 (#291)}
u] {@13: Sup: 24 (#463); Ego: 57 (#348)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 as *BEFORE* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #54 AS IDEA: @348: "This then is the statement and
solution of the whole antinomy in which reason finds itself entangled in
the application of its principles to the sensible world, and of which
the former (the mere statement) even by itself would already be of
considerable benefit toward a knowledge of human reason, even if the
solution of this conflict should not yet fully satisfy the reader, who
has here to combat a natural illusion that has only recently been
presented to him as such, after he had *HITHERTO* *ALWAYS* *TAKEN*
*THAT* *ILLUSION* *FOR* *THE* *TRUTH*.
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1347 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER
2018: "MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON [*DOLF*] AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
Fixed it for you."
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
One consequence of all this is, indeed, inevitable; namely, that since
*IT* *IS* *COMPLETELY* *IMPOSSIBLE* *TO* *ESCAPE* *FROM* *THIS*
*CONFLICT* *OF* *REASON* *WITH* *ITSELF* *AS* *LONG* *AS* *THE*
*OBJECTS* *OF* *THE* *SENSIBLE* *WORLD* *ARE* *TAKEN* *FOR* *THINGS*
*IN* *THEMSELVES* – and not for what they in fact are, that is, for mere
appearances – the reader is obliged, for that reason, to take up once
more the deduction of all our cognition a priori (and the examination of
that deduction which I have provided), in order to come to a decision
about it. For the present I do not require more; for if, through this
pursuit, he has first thought himself deeply enough into the nature of
pure reason, then the concepts by means of which alone the solution to
this conflict of reason is possible will already be familiar to him, a
circumstance without which I cannot expect full approbation from even
the most attentive reader. [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA. p 144]
RAZOO: used to denote an imaginary coin of little value or a very small
sum of money.
[R, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)}
A, {@2: Sup: 10 (#19); Ego: 1 (#10)}
Z, {@3: Sup: 81 (#100); Ego: 71 (#81)}
O, {@4: Sup: 60 (#160); Ego: 60 (#141)}
O] {@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 60 (#201)}
H6996@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
@3: Sup: 68 (#167); Ego: 9 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#206); Ego: 52 (#120),
Male: #206; Feme: #120
} // #199
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#199 as [#40, #100, #9, #700] = qatan (H6996): {UMBRA: #1 as #199 % #41
= #35} 1) young, small, insignificant, unimportant; 1a) *small*; 1b)
insignificant; 1c) young; 1d) *unimportant*;
G3664@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 29 (#99); Ego: 40 (#110),
@3: Sup: 18 (#117); Ego: 70 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@4: Sup: 28 (#145); Ego: 10 (#190),
@5: Sup: 29 (#174); Ego: 1 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
@6: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 10 (#201),
Male: #213; Feme: #201
} // #201
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #201 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#201 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #10] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #41 as
#201 % #41 = #37} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: i.e.
resembling; 1b) like: i.e. *CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*;
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1013 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER
2018: "THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI:
Who the hell are you replying to?
Please learn to Usenet."
DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...
But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.
It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.
We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.
— APPLE RELISH —
"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."
Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.
Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:
Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!
YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"
THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {
#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY
} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {
#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES
}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA:
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.
Jean Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) as Swiss Philosopher
being the originator of a seminal Cognitive Development Theory And
Epistemological View, wrote that within logic, juxtaposition {ie.
WE HOLD THE INFORMAL RESEARCH VIEW:
#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF
AS THEN THE PROVISIONAL PROPOSITION WHICH WE HAVE MADE OF
SELF-JUSTIFICATION:
#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE*
*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS
CIRCULARITY OF 22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC
PROPOSITION.
} is a logical fallacy on the part of the observer, where two items
placed next to each other imply a correlation, when none is actually
claimed. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed trait,
and regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to
biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
In the elaboration of the logical model of intellectual development,
Piaget argued that intelligence develops in a series of stages that are
related to age and are progressive because one stage must be
accomplished before the next can occur. For each stage of development
the child forms a view of reality for that age period. At the next
stage, the child must keep up with earlier level of mental abilities to
reconstruct concepts. Piaget conceived intellectual development as an
upward expanding spiral in which children must constantly reconstruct
the ideas formed at earlier levels with new, higher order concepts
acquired at the next level.
GIVE ME A CHILD TILL HIS SEVENTH YEAR AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN IS A
MAXIM OF THE CHURCH.
The action of *CASTRATO* which was practiced by ROMAN EMPEROR NERO {#666
as *PONTIFEX* *MAXIMUS*} (he replaced his wife with one) was only
outlawed within the 20th century and after the establishment of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
OCTOBER 1900 as conveying the FIRST PRINCIPLE @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL
{@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} which
is in concordance with women's suffrage ...
...such MALAKOS against the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE entitlement of
the person of another epitomises the depravity of the Roman Catholic
Church...
But wait a minute Pope Benedict XVI was in the #231 - Hitler youth {ie.
Adolf Hitler said in Table Talk Ideas @1 and @5 that fascism was a
return to the traditions of ancient Rome: @1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE {#111 / #666 - *SUNDAY* *SACREDNESS*}, #65 - soldier, #175 - marriage}
And why is he besides self justification otherwise so incapable of
answers as the breaching of our Constitutional entitlement by his
erroneous religious beliefs?
“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]

<Loading Image...
>
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873 - QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
I’M SURPRISED THAT THE FORMER POPE IS OF SUFFICIENTLY SOUND MIND TO
WRITE A COHERENT SENTENCE LET ALONE CONVEY ANY AFFECTIONS FOR TRUTH.
It was primarily the “Third Piaget” (the logical model of intellectual
development) that was debated by *AMERICAN* *PSYCHOLOGISTS* when
Piaget’s ideas were “rediscovered” in the 1960s. In the 1950s, Clare
Graves extended Piaget’s psychology through adulthood. Don Beck and
Christopher Cowan developed Graves’s model further in Spiral Dynamics.
Graves argued that humans evolve new psychological stages in response to
changing life conditions. When a society contains a critical number of
people at a given stage, the society itself transforms, creating the
social conditions for yet another stage of psychological
development. [<https://fee.org/articles/spiral-dynamics-an-overview/>]
Christopher Cowan is now deceased, however if I were to correspond with
him [which I did @ 1230 hours on 27 August, 2016 in memory of him and
his accomplishments], I would then convey the following: "I've done some
considerable informal research in advancing the 4-Quadrant, 8-Tier
paradigm proposed by yourself and Don Beck within your book published in
1996 and titled, "Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change". He had surmised of my own informal research efforts, "THOSE WHO
HAVE NOT RECENTLY VISITED DOLF BOEK'S WORK WILL FIND MUCH NEW AT
HTTP://.../TELOS. GIVEN THE SITUATION IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE AND ALL OF THE
RELIGIOUS UNDERCURRENTS IN TODAY'S WORLD, DOLF'S PERSPECTIVE OFFERS YET
ANOTHER WAY TO VIEW THE FORCES INFLUENCING HUMAN NATURE."
I was once asked by him, what I considered of Pythagoras's use of #36
and it has taken me many years of careful consideration and I feel that
I have now got an acceptable explanation: "In the process of
invalidating the original Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution
of 1901 and conveying it's dependency (ie. arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 +
3 + 4 = 10}) upon the Pythagorean Tetrad/Decad/Tetractys as the fount of
SOULS which is purveyed by the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, which I
have shown it to be a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION that is intellectually
dependent upon a superior conception of a ternary HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER."
In my view, it is concerned with the essential encapsulating knowledge
as the driver conveyed within the Pythagorean marriage (ie. being
expressed as the Harmony because it hath the power to in-generate a
vital habit as hymenealism) metathesis which has bought about it's
deployment as TETRAD OF MAGIC SQUARES {#15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111} and
that which formed the foundational basis of Roman Imperial Governance
made in association with the adoption of the Julian Calendar and which
was made against the individual Human Characteristic of an Autonomy of
Will (eg: the 'forma corporis' as the issue conveyed by the embodiment,
judicial trial and crucifixion of the historical person of Jesus {He is
saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one chosen or set
apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}).
Spiral Dynamics describes awareness development both at a personal and a
collective level, such as organisations. It is based on the works of
American Professor Emeritus of Psychology Clare W. Graves. Spiral
Dynamics describes eight levels, expressed in value systems each with
their own colours. These levels climb from simple structure to
increasing complexity. Spiral Dynamics is a registered trademark and is
mainly used in change management. It is used by advisory agencies for
personal development and organisational development. Spiral Dynamics
focuses on the development of these values.
MEMES AND GENES: Spiral Dynamics makes use of the terms from ‘memetics’;
the study of the evolution of culture and ideas. A meme is an idea that
spreads itself through information carriers, such as the human brain. It
is also described as a contagious information pattern.
Everyone is familiar with genes; the biological code carriers in human
DNA. Biologist Richard Dawkins first introduced the term ‘memes’ in his
book The Selfish Gene(1976). Genes underlie physical changes; they
multiply themselves and move from cell to cell. Memes are similar, they
move from brain to brain. They are thought systems that spread
themselves about society. Like viruses, they jump from mind to mind.
Like genes, they form the human personality. As such, memes affect
organisations and causes common thoughts. They may cause social
conflicts, but they also provide solutions. They are the driving force
behind new developments.
VALUES: In addition, according to Clare W. Graves, specific memes
represent the attractive and repulsive forces behind the development of
values. These are called value memes and within Spiral Dynamics they are
used to identify value systems. This determines how people think about
certain things and why they believe in something. It is not about what
they think. The value memes reveal the deeper value systems, on which
people judge and evaluate observations.
VALUE SYSTEMS: The value systems in Spiral Dynamics are colour coded.
The first system is the simplest and from there it gets increasingly
complex. Each value system has its own characteristic expression.
LEVEL 1 – SURVIVAL (BEIGE / BRONZE): This is the first and also the
lowest level of consciousness. It is the level of the group aimed at
survival. It focuses on the necessary biological survival needs. There
are no individuals, people organise themselves according to herd
behaviour. The strongest members are compassionate towards the weaker,
protecting them and making the decisions. The rest follows. In
situations of extreme stress or life threatening circumstances people
can regress to this level.
Characteristics: people in this level hardly communicate. Everything
that is communicated, focuses on survival (the primary necessities of life).
LEVEL 2 – SECURITY (PURPLE): This is the level of the tribe: the close
social unity in which people feel secure and, if necessary, will
sacrifice themselves for the benefit of the group. This is the security
that people seek and which is found in religion, for example. This level
creates a social unit.
Characteristics: Communication takes place verbally from the high level
to the lower level and vice versa. The leader speaks the truth and
opposition is not tolerated.
LEVEL 3 – ENERGY & POWER (RED): This is the level of divide and conquer
in which the hierarchical power structure is central. People are part of
a system and are directed by the highest power-holder. All social
relationships are power-oriented and occasionally a new order in
hierarchy takes place.
Characteristics: Communication is purely top-down. There is continuous
supervision of higher levels at lower levels. Orders are only effective
if there are sanctions. Logic and persuasion are therefore not addressed.
LEVEL 4 – ORDER (BLUE): This is the level of the conventional society,
which establishes what is right and wrong. Established conventions and
traditions are honoured and rules, procedures and structures are
strictly adhered to. At this level, the concept of deferred reward
occurs for the first time: if you do your best, you will be rewarded later.
Characteristics: Communication takes place from high to low and
horizontally. The control freak needs to know what needs to be done.
Consistent communication is very important. Intuition or feelings are
unimportant
LEVEL 5 – SUCCESS (ORANGE): This is the ideal of the individualistic
capitalist society. The truth lies in logical reasoning and (empirical)
research, after which the correct conclusion is left. People perceive
themselves as individuals. In this level, everything revolves around
success. Power equals prestige and position within the structure, which
is acquired by successful operation.
Characteristics: Communication in this level takes place from high to
low, low to high and horizontally. People are interested in each other
and want to know whether it will positively impact their career.
Communication is often focused on negotiation.
LEVEL 6 – COMMUNITY (GREEN): Green is the level of humanity and the
social network, in which man is interested in inner peace and peace with
others. In this level, people attach great importance to their social
environment and little to their own status. People make decisions as a
group, but each individual must be able to develop fully.
Characteristics: there is a lot of communication in all directions,
where the emphasis is on reaching a consensus. There is also sensitivity
to emotions and the needs of others.
LEVEL 7 – SYNERGY (YELLOW): AT this level, it is about system thinking;
realising that everything is interconnected. Tolerance is the key word
in this. People work together in a system in which they make their own
decisions. This makes it possible to work on a project basis.
Characteristics: Communication takes place as needed, and it is
important that information gets to the right place and is easily
accessible. Think about management information systems.
LEVEL 8 – HOLISTIC LIFE SUPPORT (TURQUOISE / CYAN): This is the highest
level. It is a holistic living system in which the world is seen as an
interactive, interconnected system. At this level, energy is focused on
sacrifice. Trust is put, not so much in a higher power, but in people.
People are organising themselves in order to cherish and renew the world
from macro level.
Characteristics: Communication is important in all layers; consensus and
competence are merged for the benefit of the public good.
[<https://www.toolshero.com/change-management/spiral-dynamics/>]
Here also is an attempt at integration of this centrist Sabbath values
based and ethereal belief within the framework of the 4 Quadrant-8 Tier
paradigm as model proposed in 1996 by Christopher Cowan and Don Beck as
authors of the book titled, 'Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values,
Leadership, and Change', within an article titled: 'When We Disagree:
How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation' dated 27 April, 2000 by
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, as then principal lecturer in sociology and head of
the department of behavioral sciences at Newbold College in Binfield,
England.
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT ROMAN CATHOLIC LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and though we
all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).

<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE
CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76
/ @B102] General logic (as has already been said several times)
abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits representations to
be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that,
proceeding analytically, it can first transform these representations
into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a manifold of
sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental aesthetic
offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure
concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without any
content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a manifold
of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless belong to the
conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone representations
of objects can be received, and which must therefore ever affect the
concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought demands that the
manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in a specific
manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.


<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA: @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
THE PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE
LAW OF CAUSALITY AS IDEA @B233: "ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. *NOW* *CONNECTION* *IS* *NO* *ACT* *OF* *MERE*
*SENSE* *AND* *INTUITION*, *BUT* *IS* *HERE* *THE* *PRODUCT* *OF* *A*
*SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE*
*INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME* {ie. as
metempirics relating to matters beyond the range of empirical knowledge,
metaphysical; (occasionally) affirming the validity of concepts or
beliefs not based on experience which occurs within time}. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time;
for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [IDEA: @A190] are objects, but only
in so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a #311 - *HOUSE* that stands before me is successive. Now
the question is: whether the manifold of this #311 - *HOUSE* itself also
is successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the #311 - *HOUSE* is now indeed no thing in itself, but
[IDEA: @A236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies
in the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while
the appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing
more than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object –
with which my concept, which I extract from the representations of
apprehension, has to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition
with object, it can easily be seen that here one can ask only about the
formal conditions of empirical truth, and that appearance, in
counter-relation with the representations of apprehension, can only be
represented as their object that is distinct from them if it falls under
a rule that distinguishes it from every other apprehension and makes one
way of conjoining the manifold necessary. That in the appearance which
contains the condition of this necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
#311 - *HOUSE*, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the
others. But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a
happening, I call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding
one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the
perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship
drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down succeeds
the perception of its location further up the course of the river, and
it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order.
In the previous example of a #311 - *HOUSE*, in the apprehension my
perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the #311 - *HOUSE*
and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just as
they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that
happens, and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one
another (in the apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
DOLF @ 1251 HOURS ON 8 APRIL 2019: "WE HAVE PUBLISHED THE FIRST DRAFT OF
GRUMBLE PROTOTYPE WITH THE ENTIRE BIBLE (KJV), LEXICON AND AGGREGATION
OF BIBLE IDEAS / UMBRA SO AS TO CONTEND AGAINST FALSE OATHS SWORN BY
ALMIGHTY GOD:
We have now published the first draft of the entire BIBLICAL narrative
content within the GRUMBLE prototype which will enable us to reasonably
and factually object to OATHS by ALMIGHTY GOD undertaken by these
persons (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL / RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (ROMAN
CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY: KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL) as being FALSE OATHS:
'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'
And ipso facto PERJURY in sustaining their WILFUL misconduct in
advancing an UNTRUTHFUL and PROPAGANDISED ANZAC TRADITION being
CONTEMPTUOUS breaches of the FIRST PRINCIPLES such as #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREE WILL (#41 x 12 JURORS as JUDICIAL PRACTICE) underpinning QUEEN
VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
BEING THEREBY A #312 - CONTRADICTION TO THE PRINCIPLES / VALUES ESPOUSED
BY QUEEN VICTORIA'S 29 OCTOBER 1900 LETTERS PATENT AS INSTRUMENTATION TO
THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY THE “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL” DATED
17 SEPTEMBER 1900 THAT IS CONVEYED BY THEIR MORE SUBSTANTIAL OATH BY
ALMIGHTY GOD / DIEU ET MON DROIT AS EXPLICIT VALUE STATEMENT WHICH DATES
BACK TO AT LEAST 1570:
'YOU WILL TO YOUR UTTERMOST BEAR FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE UNTO THE QUEEN'S
MAJESTY; AND WILL ASSIST AND DEFEND ALL JURISDICTIONS, PRE-EMINENCES,
AND AUTHORITIES, GRANTED TO HER MAJESTY, AND ANNEXED TO THE CROWN BY
ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, OR *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL* *FOREIGN* *PRINCES*,
*PERSONS*, *PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR* *POTENTATES*.'
AND THEREFORE AS BREACHES OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO:
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
MINUS
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*
EQUALS
#73 - IMMUTABILITY {#INRI} 4 BCE
"*I* *LAY* *DOWN* *MY* *LIFE*, *THAT* *I* *MIGHT* *TAKE* {@113 : [#30,
#1, #2, #70, #10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT} *IT* *AGAIN*. *NO* *MAN* *TAKETH* *IT* *FROM* *ME*, *BUT*
*I* *LAY* *IT* *DOWN* *OF* *MYSELF*. *I* *HAVE* *POWER* *TO* *LAY* *IT*
*DOWN*, *AND* *I* *HAVE* *POWER* *TO* *TAKE* *IT* *AGAIN*. THIS
COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18 (KJV)]"
OUGHT THEN TO BE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED AS
AN BINOMIAL STASIS BASIS TO STATUS AS EMANATION OF STATE {
@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE {ie. #33 / #77 AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL} OF VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 -
*ICOSAHEDRON* / *MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS
} as breaches made of Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human
Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1)
Subject to this section, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in
a way that is incompatible with a human right or, in making a decision,
to fail to give proper consideration to a relevant human right.
EXCERPT: “MELBOURNE FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC” dated 11 to 13 April 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Melbourne%20Fertility%20Control%20Clinic%2020190411.pdf>
- dolf
Initial Post: 14 April 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
PROPAGANDISED BY INTEGRAL WORLD WHICH IS INTENTIONED ON DESTABILISING
SOVEREIGN NATIONS?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April, 2019
The following statement made within an interview of Frank Visser by a
vegan neo-Nazi David Long is entirely false as an act of public
deception due to the circumstance that an Intellectual Categorical
Imperative (ie. 4 quadrants) within an eight tier transformational
process of #312 - CONTRADICTION (ie. How else might it differentiate
reality) is reliant upon a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL so as to then
maintain its acceptable #81 - ORDER OF THINGS and therefore is
implicitly antagonistic towards the SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE as
the sapient dignity of the person.
WHAT DO YOU SAY TO PEOPLE WHO SAY INTEGRAL WORLD IS NOT THE #311 - HOME
OF GOOD CRITICISM?
I think that's a very easy dismissal itself. If this forum has been
alive for twenty years, and has been for a long time the only online
forum to seriously discuss these ideas, what you can expect is a great
variety of quality of submissions to that forum, but for sure there have
been some valid ideas that have been expressed. Even a whole book, by
Jeff Meyerhoff, has been published on that website and I hope my
contributions also count as valid criticism, so I really don't know what
to say about these kinds of responses. Because you can use that argument
until the *COW* {ie.
8 APRIL 2018
AS DATE OF VEGAN PROTESTERS UNAPOLOGETIC FOR MELBOURNE'S PEAK-HOUR
CHAOS, ABATTOIR BLOCKADES
<https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/vegan-protesters-unapologetic-for-melbourne-s-peak-hour-chaos-abattoir-blockades-20190408-p51by5.html>
H1241@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 10 (#24); Ego: 2 (#10),
@4: Sup: 29 (#53); Ego: 19 (#29),
@5: Sup: 67 (#120); Ego: 38 (#67),
@6: Sup: 36 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 50 (#117),
@7: Sup: 42 (#198); Ego: 6 (#123),
Male: #198; Feme: #123
} // #36
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #302 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; I am not a land-grabber.
#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), daily increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #14
#302 as [#2, #100, #200] / #366 as [#6, #2, #2, #100, #200, #50, #6] =
bâqâr (H1241): {UMBRA: #0 as #302 % #41 = #15} 1) cattle, herd, oxen,
ox; 1a) cattle (generic pl. but sing. in form - coll); 1b) herd
(particular one); 1c) head of cattle (individually);
} come #311 - *HOME*, and you are really neck-deep into your ideology,
but you really need to engage your criticism to avoid that #302 -
*DANGER*." [<http://www.integralworld.net/long2.html>]
That any dialogue which doesn’t deploy their semantics of opportunity is
then subject to scorn, censorship and isolationism and by such actions
does not convey any intellectual integrity and fails to foster honest
enquiry.
Nous: #12
Time: 01:15 hrs
Date: 2019.4.8
Torah: [#70, #30, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 59 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 40 (#140 -
I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #148; Feme: #140
} // #140
Dao: Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire
Tetra: #25 - Contention
I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit
Latin: Altissimus {Hidden God; cf: high; deep/profound; shrill; lofty,
noble; deep rooted; far-fetched; grown great (Vulgate [Psalms 45:7])}
Alt: Amamyah {Join with God} {
1. HELPS AGAINST SPIRITUAL TORMENT & REVEALS TRAITORS
2. SEA VOYAGES
3. OF DISCOVERIES
4. Senacher , Sennacherib {bramble; thistle}
}
Solar Eclipse: 27 February 1998 (AEST)
Solar Eclipse: 8 April 2005 (AEST)
Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively a chamber or dwelling:-nest,
room), buyer; owner}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#427 / #366} / HETEROS {#455 / #380} / TORAH {#461
/ #383}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:6,nous:12&lexicon:H1241>
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2019.4.8, Time: 01:15
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]
*THAT* *THE* *POSTER* {:-]))) <***@wuji.net> IS ENGAGING IN SUBTERFUGE
AND OUGHT TO BE PLACED ON A TERRORIST WATCH LIST...
BUDGIE TALK: "How have u been?"
MOI: "I have a headache at present...
But otherwise very happy with the world since I sunk an attempt by others:
#273 - REASON (FORMULA FOR PRESERVATION OF EUROPEAN AUTONOMY)
#302 - TRAP / JUXTAPOSITION
#362 - MOUSE
(An unusual triangulation of three numbers given by my intellectual
property as actions others were publicly engaged)
To override our nation’s sovereignty which was associated with the
toilet defamation on 28 October 2017 when I gave a carpe diem against
the local RSL / Catholic / Knights Templars International whom were up
to no good...
A year later I had an improper attempted delivery of toilet blocks to my
home address ...
YOUTUBE: "Flushed Away (Trailer)"
I will win my court case
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#362 / #302} / HETEROS {#331 / #327} / TORAH {#406
/ #324}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/grumble.html?zen:1,row:6,col:1,nous:60&lexicon:G3850>
***@zen: 1, row: 6, col: 1, nous: 60 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #362 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15
- Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small, Ego: #302 / #60 - Skill
Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15 - Modesty, Humbling;
Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small]
G3850@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 22 (#222); Ego: 2 (#103),
@6: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 70 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
@7: Sup: 41 (#274); Ego: 30 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#323); Ego: 8 (#211),
@9: Sup: 59 (#382); Ego: 10 (#221),
Male: #382; Feme: #221
} // #302
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.
#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115 <--- *DIGNITY * ROYAL*
#302 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #70, #30, #8, #10] = parabolḗ (G3850):
{UMBRA: #79 as #292 % #41 = #5} 1) *A* *PLACING* *OF* *ONE* *THING* *BY*
*THE* *SIDE* *OF* *ANOTHER*, *JUXTAPOSITION*, as of ships in battle; 2)
metaph.; 2a) a comparing, comparison of one thing with another,
likeness, similitude; 2b) an example by which a doctrine or precept is
illustrated; 2c) *A* *NARRATIVE*, *FICTITIOUS* *BUT* *AGREEABLE* *TO*
*THE* *LAWS* *AND* *USAGES* *OF* *HUMAN* *LIFE*, by which either the
duties of men or the things of God, particularly the nature and history
of God's kingdom are figuratively portrayed; 2d) *A* *PARABLE*: *AN*
*EARTHLY* *STORY* *WITH* *A* *HEAVENLY* *MEANING*; 3) a pithy and
instructive saying, involving some likeness or comparison and having
preceptive or admonitory force; 3a) an aphorism, a maxim; 4) a proverb;
5) *AN* *ACT* *BY* *WHICH* *ONE* *EXPOSES* *HIMSELF* *OR* *HIS*
*POSSESSIONS* *TO* *DANGER*, *A* *VENTURE*, *A* *RISK*;
"Therefore- speak I to them in parables-G3850: because they seeing see
not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand." [Matthew 13:13]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Potty%20Mouth.pdf>
EGGIE (***@KROTEKO.COM) @ 0201 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "WHY
BELIEVE SCIENCE WHEN YOU CAN BELIEVE TRUMP?
I believe everything Trump says. I don't believe anything scientists say.
Trump will make me grate.
No education is required to believe Trump. Everything he says is simple."
DOLF @ 0519 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "
— GNOSIS OSMOSIS —
“REGGIE THE VEGGIE
TRIES TO BE RECUSED.
OF A NAZI IDENTITY.
BUT AS MEATHEAD.
A PARADING VEGAN. {@334 - PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS
(Critique, pp. 341 ff.)}
BY A FLAP IS FIXATED.
HE’S A CHEESY BOGAN.
THAT’S EMANCIPATED.”
<https://www.facebook.com/125982670754724/posts/2268673266485643/>

<Loading Image...
>[SBS NEWS @ 1500 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: Veganism is growing in
popularity – will it eventually become the norm?]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS: @334: It has long
been observed that in all substances the true subject – namely that
which remains after all accidents (as predicates) have been removed –
and hence the substantial itself, is unknown to us; and various
complaints have been made about these limits to our insight. But it
needs to be said that human understanding is not to be blamed because it
does not know the substantial in things, i.e., cannot determine it by
itself, but rather because it wants to cognize determinately, like an
object that is given, what is only an idea. Pure reason demands that for
each predicate of a thing we should seek its appropriate subject, but
that for this subject, which is in turn necessarily only a predicate, we
should seek its subject again, and so forth to infinity (or as far as we
get). But from this it follows that we should take nothing that we can
attain for a final subject, and that the substantial itself could never
be thought by our ever-so-deeply penetrating understanding, even if
*THE* *WHOLE* *OF* *NATURE* *WERE* *LAID* *BARE* *BEFORE* *IT*; for the
specific nature of our understanding consists in thinking everything
discursively, i.e., through concepts, hence through mere predicates,
among which the absolute subject must therefore always be absent.
Consequently, *ALL* *REAL* *PROPERTIES* *BY* *WHICH* *WE* *COGNIZE*
*BODIES* *ARE* *MERE* *ACCIDENTS* *FOR* *WHICH* *WE* *LACK* *A*
*SUBJECT* – *EVEN* *IMPENETRABILITY*, *WHICH* *MUST* *ALWAYS* *BE*
*CONCEIVED* *ONLY* *AS* *THE* *EFFECT* *OF* *A* *FORCE*." [Page 85, 86]
Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of this
PARIS RIOTS picture (shown above) as presumably an Islamic binomial
mindset of an unreasoned methodology yet presumptuously claiming to
dictate peace as conveying circularity of #492 - AUTONOMOUS VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL (ie. either Liberty / Egalitarian depending upon the nuance) in
being paradoxically entirely of a trinomial providence:
MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
DOLF @ 1528 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "We see from another poster's
unreasoned and pejorative response just how true and self satisfying a
contempt by ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL can really be and
especially so within a herd mentality where a foolsome dignity is
bestowed by a common consensus but doesn't have sufficient sensibility
excepting its own self-entitlement by which it engorges itself within a
hedonistic lustful *FRAUDULENT* indecency that it's opine is worth
something more than a *RAZOO* ...
[F, {@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6)}
i, {@2: Sup: 15 (#21); Ego: 9 (#15)}
x, {@3: Sup: 48 (#69); Ego: 33 (#48)}
e, {@4: Sup: 53 (#122); Ego: 5 (#53)}
d, {@5: Sup: 57 (#179); Ego: 4 (#57)}
i, {@6: Sup: 66 (#245); Ego: 9 (#66)}
t, {@7: Sup: 23 (#268); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})}
f, {@8: Sup: 29 (#297); Ego: 6 (#110)}
o, {@9: Sup: 8 (#305); Ego: 60 (#170)}
r, {@10: Sup: 17 (#322); Ego: 9 (#179)}
y, {@11: Sup: 69 (#391 ***); Ego: 52 (#231 ***)}
o, {@12: Sup: 48 (#439); Ego: 60 (#291)}
u] {@13: Sup: 24 (#463); Ego: 57 (#348)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 as *BEFORE* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #54 AS IDEA: @348: "This then is the statement and
solution of the whole antinomy in which reason finds itself entangled in
the application of its principles to the sensible world, and of which
the former (the mere statement) even by itself would already be of
considerable benefit toward a knowledge of human reason, even if the
solution of this conflict should not yet fully satisfy the reader, who
has here to combat a natural illusion that has only recently been
presented to him as such, after he had *HITHERTO* *ALWAYS* *TAKEN*
*THAT* *ILLUSION* *FOR* *THE* *TRUTH*.
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1347 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER
2018: "MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON [*DOLF*] AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
Fixed it for you."
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
One consequence of all this is, indeed, inevitable; namely, that since
*IT* *IS* *COMPLETELY* *IMPOSSIBLE* *TO* *ESCAPE* *FROM* *THIS*
*CONFLICT* *OF* *REASON* *WITH* *ITSELF* *AS* *LONG* *AS* *THE*
*OBJECTS* *OF* *THE* *SENSIBLE* *WORLD* *ARE* *TAKEN* *FOR* *THINGS*
*IN* *THEMSELVES* – and not for what they in fact are, that is, for mere
appearances – the reader is obliged, for that reason, to take up once
more the deduction of all our cognition a priori (and the examination of
that deduction which I have provided), in order to come to a decision
about it. For the present I do not require more; for if, through this
pursuit, he has first thought himself deeply enough into the nature of
pure reason, then the concepts by means of which alone the solution to
this conflict of reason is possible will already be familiar to him, a
circumstance without which I cannot expect full approbation from even
the most attentive reader. [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA. p 144]
RAZOO: used to denote an imaginary coin of little value or a very small
sum of money.
[R, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)}
A, {@2: Sup: 10 (#19); Ego: 1 (#10)}
Z, {@3: Sup: 81 (#100); Ego: 71 (#81)}
O, {@4: Sup: 60 (#160); Ego: 60 (#141)}
O] {@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 60 (#201)}
H6996@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
@3: Sup: 68 (#167); Ego: 9 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#206); Ego: 52 (#120),
Male: #206; Feme: #120
} // #199
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#199 as [#40, #100, #9, #700] = qatan (H6996): {UMBRA: #1 as #199 % #41
= #35} 1) young, small, insignificant, unimportant; 1a) *small*; 1b)
insignificant; 1c) young; 1d) *unimportant*;
G3664@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 29 (#99); Ego: 40 (#110),
@3: Sup: 18 (#117); Ego: 70 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@4: Sup: 28 (#145); Ego: 10 (#190),
@5: Sup: 29 (#174); Ego: 1 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
@6: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 10 (#201),
Male: #213; Feme: #201
} // #201
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #201 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#201 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #10] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #41 as
#201 % #41 = #37} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: i.e.
resembling; 1b) like: i.e. *CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*;
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1013 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER
2018: "THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI:
Who the hell are you replying to?
Please learn to Usenet."
DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...
But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.
It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.
We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.
— APPLE RELISH —
"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."
Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.
Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:
Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!
YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"
THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {
#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY
} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {
#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES
}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA:
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.
Jean Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) as Swiss Philosopher
being the originator of a seminal Cognitive Development Theory And
Epistemological View, wrote that within logic, juxtaposition {ie.
WE HOLD THE INFORMAL RESEARCH VIEW:
#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF
AS THEN THE PROVISIONAL PROPOSITION WHICH WE HAVE MADE OF
SELF-JUSTIFICATION:
#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE*
*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS
CIRCULARITY OF 22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC
PROPOSITION.
} is a logical fallacy on the part of the observer, where two items
placed next to each other imply a correlation, when none is actually
claimed. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed trait,
and regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to
biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
In the elaboration of the logical model of intellectual development,
Piaget argued that intelligence develops in a series of stages that are
related to age and are progressive because one stage must be
accomplished before the next can occur. For each stage of development
the child forms a view of reality for that age period. At the next
stage, the child must keep up with earlier level of mental abilities to
reconstruct concepts. Piaget conceived intellectual development as an
upward expanding spiral in which children must constantly reconstruct
the ideas formed at earlier levels with new, higher order concepts
acquired at the next level.
GIVE ME A CHILD TILL HIS SEVENTH YEAR AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN IS A
MAXIM OF THE CHURCH.
The action of *CASTRATO* which was practiced by ROMAN EMPEROR NERO {#666
as *PONTIFEX* *MAXIMUS*} (he replaced his wife with one) was only
outlawed within the 20th century and after the establishment of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
OCTOBER 1900 as conveying the FIRST PRINCIPLE @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL
{@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} which
is in concordance with women's suffrage ...
...such MALAKOS against the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE entitlement of
the person of another epitomises the depravity of the Roman Catholic
Church...
But wait a minute Pope Benedict XVI was in the #231 - Hitler youth {ie.
Adolf Hitler said in Table Talk Ideas @1 and @5 that fascism was a
return to the traditions of ancient Rome: @1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE {#111 / #666 - *SUNDAY* *SACREDNESS*}, #65 - soldier, #175 - marriage}
And why is he besides self justification otherwise so incapable of
answers as the breaching of our Constitutional entitlement by his
erroneous religious beliefs?
“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]

<Loading Image...
>#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873 - QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
I’M SURPRISED THAT THE FORMER POPE IS OF SUFFICIENTLY SOUND MIND TO
WRITE A COHERENT SENTENCE LET ALONE CONVEY ANY AFFECTIONS FOR TRUTH.
It was primarily the “Third Piaget” (the logical model of intellectual
development) that was debated by *AMERICAN* *PSYCHOLOGISTS* when
Piaget’s ideas were “rediscovered” in the 1960s. In the 1950s, Clare
Graves extended Piaget’s psychology through adulthood. Don Beck and
Christopher Cowan developed Graves’s model further in Spiral Dynamics.
Graves argued that humans evolve new psychological stages in response to
changing life conditions. When a society contains a critical number of
people at a given stage, the society itself transforms, creating the
social conditions for yet another stage of psychological
development. [<https://fee.org/articles/spiral-dynamics-an-overview/>]
Christopher Cowan is now deceased, however if I were to correspond with
him [which I did @ 1230 hours on 27 August, 2016 in memory of him and
his accomplishments], I would then convey the following: "I've done some
considerable informal research in advancing the 4-Quadrant, 8-Tier
paradigm proposed by yourself and Don Beck within your book published in
1996 and titled, "Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change". He had surmised of my own informal research efforts, "THOSE WHO
HAVE NOT RECENTLY VISITED DOLF BOEK'S WORK WILL FIND MUCH NEW AT
HTTP://.../TELOS. GIVEN THE SITUATION IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE AND ALL OF THE
RELIGIOUS UNDERCURRENTS IN TODAY'S WORLD, DOLF'S PERSPECTIVE OFFERS YET
ANOTHER WAY TO VIEW THE FORCES INFLUENCING HUMAN NATURE."
I was once asked by him, what I considered of Pythagoras's use of #36
and it has taken me many years of careful consideration and I feel that
I have now got an acceptable explanation: "In the process of
invalidating the original Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution
of 1901 and conveying it's dependency (ie. arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 +
3 + 4 = 10}) upon the Pythagorean Tetrad/Decad/Tetractys as the fount of
SOULS which is purveyed by the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, which I
have shown it to be a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION that is intellectually
dependent upon a superior conception of a ternary HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER."
In my view, it is concerned with the essential encapsulating knowledge
as the driver conveyed within the Pythagorean marriage (ie. being
expressed as the Harmony because it hath the power to in-generate a
vital habit as hymenealism) metathesis which has bought about it's
deployment as TETRAD OF MAGIC SQUARES {#15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111} and
that which formed the foundational basis of Roman Imperial Governance
made in association with the adoption of the Julian Calendar and which
was made against the individual Human Characteristic of an Autonomy of
Will (eg: the 'forma corporis' as the issue conveyed by the embodiment,
judicial trial and crucifixion of the historical person of Jesus {He is
saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one chosen or set
apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}).
Spiral Dynamics describes awareness development both at a personal and a
collective level, such as organisations. It is based on the works of
American Professor Emeritus of Psychology Clare W. Graves. Spiral
Dynamics describes eight levels, expressed in value systems each with
their own colours. These levels climb from simple structure to
increasing complexity. Spiral Dynamics is a registered trademark and is
mainly used in change management. It is used by advisory agencies for
personal development and organisational development. Spiral Dynamics
focuses on the development of these values.
MEMES AND GENES: Spiral Dynamics makes use of the terms from ‘memetics’;
the study of the evolution of culture and ideas. A meme is an idea that
spreads itself through information carriers, such as the human brain. It
is also described as a contagious information pattern.
Everyone is familiar with genes; the biological code carriers in human
DNA. Biologist Richard Dawkins first introduced the term ‘memes’ in his
book The Selfish Gene(1976). Genes underlie physical changes; they
multiply themselves and move from cell to cell. Memes are similar, they
move from brain to brain. They are thought systems that spread
themselves about society. Like viruses, they jump from mind to mind.
Like genes, they form the human personality. As such, memes affect
organisations and causes common thoughts. They may cause social
conflicts, but they also provide solutions. They are the driving force
behind new developments.
VALUES: In addition, according to Clare W. Graves, specific memes
represent the attractive and repulsive forces behind the development of
values. These are called value memes and within Spiral Dynamics they are
used to identify value systems. This determines how people think about
certain things and why they believe in something. It is not about what
they think. The value memes reveal the deeper value systems, on which
people judge and evaluate observations.
VALUE SYSTEMS: The value systems in Spiral Dynamics are colour coded.
The first system is the simplest and from there it gets increasingly
complex. Each value system has its own characteristic expression.
LEVEL 1 – SURVIVAL (BEIGE / BRONZE): This is the first and also the
lowest level of consciousness. It is the level of the group aimed at
survival. It focuses on the necessary biological survival needs. There
are no individuals, people organise themselves according to herd
behaviour. The strongest members are compassionate towards the weaker,
protecting them and making the decisions. The rest follows. In
situations of extreme stress or life threatening circumstances people
can regress to this level.
Characteristics: people in this level hardly communicate. Everything
that is communicated, focuses on survival (the primary necessities of life).
LEVEL 2 – SECURITY (PURPLE): This is the level of the tribe: the close
social unity in which people feel secure and, if necessary, will
sacrifice themselves for the benefit of the group. This is the security
that people seek and which is found in religion, for example. This level
creates a social unit.
Characteristics: Communication takes place verbally from the high level
to the lower level and vice versa. The leader speaks the truth and
opposition is not tolerated.
LEVEL 3 – ENERGY & POWER (RED): This is the level of divide and conquer
in which the hierarchical power structure is central. People are part of
a system and are directed by the highest power-holder. All social
relationships are power-oriented and occasionally a new order in
hierarchy takes place.
Characteristics: Communication is purely top-down. There is continuous
supervision of higher levels at lower levels. Orders are only effective
if there are sanctions. Logic and persuasion are therefore not addressed.
LEVEL 4 – ORDER (BLUE): This is the level of the conventional society,
which establishes what is right and wrong. Established conventions and
traditions are honoured and rules, procedures and structures are
strictly adhered to. At this level, the concept of deferred reward
occurs for the first time: if you do your best, you will be rewarded later.
Characteristics: Communication takes place from high to low and
horizontally. The control freak needs to know what needs to be done.
Consistent communication is very important. Intuition or feelings are
unimportant
LEVEL 5 – SUCCESS (ORANGE): This is the ideal of the individualistic
capitalist society. The truth lies in logical reasoning and (empirical)
research, after which the correct conclusion is left. People perceive
themselves as individuals. In this level, everything revolves around
success. Power equals prestige and position within the structure, which
is acquired by successful operation.
Characteristics: Communication in this level takes place from high to
low, low to high and horizontally. People are interested in each other
and want to know whether it will positively impact their career.
Communication is often focused on negotiation.
LEVEL 6 – COMMUNITY (GREEN): Green is the level of humanity and the
social network, in which man is interested in inner peace and peace with
others. In this level, people attach great importance to their social
environment and little to their own status. People make decisions as a
group, but each individual must be able to develop fully.
Characteristics: there is a lot of communication in all directions,
where the emphasis is on reaching a consensus. There is also sensitivity
to emotions and the needs of others.
LEVEL 7 – SYNERGY (YELLOW): AT this level, it is about system thinking;
realising that everything is interconnected. Tolerance is the key word
in this. People work together in a system in which they make their own
decisions. This makes it possible to work on a project basis.
Characteristics: Communication takes place as needed, and it is
important that information gets to the right place and is easily
accessible. Think about management information systems.
LEVEL 8 – HOLISTIC LIFE SUPPORT (TURQUOISE / CYAN): This is the highest
level. It is a holistic living system in which the world is seen as an
interactive, interconnected system. At this level, energy is focused on
sacrifice. Trust is put, not so much in a higher power, but in people.
People are organising themselves in order to cherish and renew the world
from macro level.
Characteristics: Communication is important in all layers; consensus and
competence are merged for the benefit of the public good.
[<https://www.toolshero.com/change-management/spiral-dynamics/>]
Here also is an attempt at integration of this centrist Sabbath values
based and ethereal belief within the framework of the 4 Quadrant-8 Tier
paradigm as model proposed in 1996 by Christopher Cowan and Don Beck as
authors of the book titled, 'Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values,
Leadership, and Change', within an article titled: 'When We Disagree:
How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation' dated 27 April, 2000 by
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, as then principal lecturer in sociology and head of
the department of behavioral sciences at Newbold College in Binfield,
England.
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT ROMAN CATHOLIC LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and though we
all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).

<Loading Image...
>[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE
CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76
/ @B102] General logic (as has already been said several times)
abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits representations to
be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that,
proceeding analytically, it can first transform these representations
into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a manifold of
sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental aesthetic
offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure
concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without any
content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a manifold
of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless belong to the
conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone representations
of objects can be received, and which must therefore ever affect the
concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought demands that the
manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in a specific
manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.


<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA: @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
THE PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE
LAW OF CAUSALITY AS IDEA @B233: "ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. *NOW* *CONNECTION* *IS* *NO* *ACT* *OF* *MERE*
*SENSE* *AND* *INTUITION*, *BUT* *IS* *HERE* *THE* *PRODUCT* *OF* *A*
*SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE*
*INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME* {ie. as
metempirics relating to matters beyond the range of empirical knowledge,
metaphysical; (occasionally) affirming the validity of concepts or
beliefs not based on experience which occurs within time}. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time;
for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [IDEA: @A190] are objects, but only
in so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a #311 - *HOUSE* that stands before me is successive. Now
the question is: whether the manifold of this #311 - *HOUSE* itself also
is successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the #311 - *HOUSE* is now indeed no thing in itself, but
[IDEA: @A236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies
in the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while
the appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing
more than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object –
with which my concept, which I extract from the representations of
apprehension, has to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition
with object, it can easily be seen that here one can ask only about the
formal conditions of empirical truth, and that appearance, in
counter-relation with the representations of apprehension, can only be
represented as their object that is distinct from them if it falls under
a rule that distinguishes it from every other apprehension and makes one
way of conjoining the manifold necessary. That in the appearance which
contains the condition of this necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
#311 - *HOUSE*, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the
others. But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a
happening, I call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding
one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the
perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship
drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down succeeds
the perception of its location further up the course of the river, and
it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order.
In the previous example of a #311 - *HOUSE*, in the apprehension my
perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the #311 - *HOUSE*
and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just as
they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that
happens, and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one
another (in the apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
DOLF @ 1251 HOURS ON 8 APRIL 2019: "WE HAVE PUBLISHED THE FIRST DRAFT OF
GRUMBLE PROTOTYPE WITH THE ENTIRE BIBLE (KJV), LEXICON AND AGGREGATION
OF BIBLE IDEAS / UMBRA SO AS TO CONTEND AGAINST FALSE OATHS SWORN BY
ALMIGHTY GOD:
We have now published the first draft of the entire BIBLICAL narrative
content within the GRUMBLE prototype which will enable us to reasonably
and factually object to OATHS by ALMIGHTY GOD undertaken by these
persons (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL / RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (ROMAN
CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY: KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL) as being FALSE OATHS:
'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'
And ipso facto PERJURY in sustaining their WILFUL misconduct in
advancing an UNTRUTHFUL and PROPAGANDISED ANZAC TRADITION being
CONTEMPTUOUS breaches of the FIRST PRINCIPLES such as #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREE WILL (#41 x 12 JURORS as JUDICIAL PRACTICE) underpinning QUEEN
VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
BEING THEREBY A #312 - CONTRADICTION TO THE PRINCIPLES / VALUES ESPOUSED
BY QUEEN VICTORIA'S 29 OCTOBER 1900 LETTERS PATENT AS INSTRUMENTATION TO
THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY THE “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL” DATED
17 SEPTEMBER 1900 THAT IS CONVEYED BY THEIR MORE SUBSTANTIAL OATH BY
ALMIGHTY GOD / DIEU ET MON DROIT AS EXPLICIT VALUE STATEMENT WHICH DATES
BACK TO AT LEAST 1570:
'YOU WILL TO YOUR UTTERMOST BEAR FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE UNTO THE QUEEN'S
MAJESTY; AND WILL ASSIST AND DEFEND ALL JURISDICTIONS, PRE-EMINENCES,
AND AUTHORITIES, GRANTED TO HER MAJESTY, AND ANNEXED TO THE CROWN BY
ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, OR *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL* *FOREIGN* *PRINCES*,
*PERSONS*, *PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR* *POTENTATES*.'
AND THEREFORE AS BREACHES OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO:
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
MINUS
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*
EQUALS
#73 - IMMUTABILITY {#INRI} 4 BCE
"*I* *LAY* *DOWN* *MY* *LIFE*, *THAT* *I* *MIGHT* *TAKE* {@113 : [#30,
#1, #2, #70, #10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT} *IT* *AGAIN*. *NO* *MAN* *TAKETH* *IT* *FROM* *ME*, *BUT*
*I* *LAY* *IT* *DOWN* *OF* *MYSELF*. *I* *HAVE* *POWER* *TO* *LAY* *IT*
*DOWN*, *AND* *I* *HAVE* *POWER* *TO* *TAKE* *IT* *AGAIN*. THIS
COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18 (KJV)]"
OUGHT THEN TO BE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED AS
AN BINOMIAL STASIS BASIS TO STATUS AS EMANATION OF STATE {
@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE {ie. #33 / #77 AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL} OF VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 -
*ICOSAHEDRON* / *MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS
} as breaches made of Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human
Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1)
Subject to this section, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in
a way that is incompatible with a human right or, in making a decision,
to fail to give proper consideration to a relevant human right.
EXCERPT: “MELBOURNE FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC” dated 11 to 13 April 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Melbourne%20Fertility%20Control%20Clinic%2020190411.pdf>
- dolf
Initial Post: 14 April 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
