Discussion:
Grand Canyon and Noahs Flood
(too old to reply)
Elijahovah
2009-07-29 13:51:13 UTC
Permalink
This post of mine in all these newsgroups was also posted separately
by me in talk.origins
If you do not see it in talk.origins it is because the moderators
block all posts they regard as by creationists and they allow only the
posters who slam creationism. This is why you should know that death
of millions then billions is always in the hands of these people who
think their decision makes them gods of what is right.

http://forum.bib-arch.org/artifactstexts/grand-canyon-exposes-armageddon-nature/

my own charts as the creationist you think that i am.
I took charts and redated events.

Creationists are wrong.
The Canyon was not laid down and compressed by the last global Flood
(2370 BC carbon 14 as 20,000 years).
It was built up during the several global floods prior to Adam.
Moses wouldnt know about this since to him the fossils merely show
they existed in that order, and were buried by water. If he had
thought
about it then he would have realized that what came down for Noah
was only the remainder of a water canopy whose bottom had come down
many times before each time an asteroid threw dust up. This process of
impact is what creates higher land to become land plates. Further it
is also what creates layers in the land so that upon the mantle the
land plates are boyant enough to stay above ocean basins.

Thus Noah's Flood carved the Grand Canyon, it did not build it up
burying the fossils.
There were other exact global floods before it, each lasting one year,
a tectonic drop
for 5 months and rise back up in 8 months. As will occur from the 2009
Nov 6 impact
for Nov 13 global mantle soup about 1-1.5 miles under all crust.

Do not assume the Canyon had been carved from top to bottom by the one
single Flood,
if the river Euphrates existed before Noah's Flood then so did the
Colorado River exist
before it.
Timelord
2009-07-31 05:37:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Elijahovah
This post of mine in all these newsgroups was also posted separately
by me in talk.origins
If you do not see it in talk.origins it is because the moderators
block all posts they regard as by creationists and they allow only the
posters who slam creationism. This is why you should know that death
of millions then billions is always in the hands of these people who
think their decision makes them gods of what is right.
http://forum.bib-arch.org/artifactstexts/grand-canyon-exposes-armageddon-nature/
<Snip>

I have bin reading your posts ( please look at "The moon Clock" )...
--
Thanks,
Timelord
Charlie's Place BBS - Games Gif's Downloads Newsgroups
--- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 2.04
Charlie's Place BBS - http://cpbbs.synchro.net - telnet://cpbbs.synchro.net - ftp://cpbbs.synchro.net/00index.html
Elijahovah
2009-07-31 11:17:41 UTC
Permalink
I have bin reading your posts ( please look at "The moon Clock" )...


Primitive but cool.
It is called a (paper) volvelle.
I have a Precession clock on volvelle that I made 20 years ago.
It shows the sun and time and date for the stars 2000 to 4000 years
ago.
I even sent it into a contest for my niece who won entry into finalist
if she signed a release saying it was her own invention. Obviously we
didnt do that, but the contest was asking predictions for 2000
(student imagination) and I put that the chariot wheels would be
discovered in the Red Sea, oddly several years go by and Ron Wyatt
makes the claim, Always wondered if it was a stolen idea.
Timelord
2009-08-01 02:57:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timelord
I have bin reading your posts ( please look at "The moon Clock" )...
Primitive but cool.
It is called a (paper) volvelle.
I have a Precession clock on volvelle that I made 20 years ago.
It shows the sun and time and date for the stars 2000 to 4000 years
ago.
I even sent it into a contest for my niece who won entry into finalist
if she signed a release saying it was her own invention. Obviously we
didnt do that, but the contest was asking predictions for 2000
(student imagination) and I put that the chariot wheels would be
discovered in the Red Sea, oddly several years go by and Ron Wyatt
makes the claim, Always wondered if it was a stolen idea.
I vas not familiar with that one, But the moons orbit shows the age of
earth.
--
Thanks,
Timelord
Charlie's Place BBS - Games Gif's Downloads Newsgroups
--- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 2.04
Charlie's Place BBS - http://cpbbs.synchro.net - telnet://cpbbs.synchro.net - ftp://cpbbs.synchro.net/00index.html
Elijahovah
2009-08-01 13:08:15 UTC
Permalink
I dont dispute the age of the Earth before Day One.
But I cannot say that orbit shows that, because some force caused the
illusion of sun and moon standing still for Joshua, and an orbit did
exist 41 years from 1514-1473 BC creating the shikinah light pillar,
and a force upon the Earth that backs the sun up for Hezekiah (after
it killed 185,000), and the greatest force which hit the Earth and put
all continents under Noahs water.... these are not forces that do not
effect moon's orbit.

So you cannot do as all scholars do and trace everything back as an
uninterupted clock.
They do that with the 365-day calendar, they do that with sidereal
years and tropical years;
they do that with rate of sediments in rivers. HEY
YOU CANNOT DO THAT---- ITS A LIE
Cory Albrecht
2009-08-02 04:42:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Elijahovah
This post of mine in all these newsgroups was also posted separately
by me in talk.origins
If you do not see it in talk.origins it is because the moderators
block all posts they regard as by creationists and they allow only the
posters who slam creationism.
If this were true, Mr.Schiller, then people like Ray Martinez, Tony
Pagano, Adman, well, their posts would never be seen in talk.origins.
IOW, you're a liar.
Post by Elijahovah
This is why you should know that death
of millions then billions is always in the hands of these people who
think their decision makes them gods of what is right.
http://forum.bib-arch.org/artifactstexts/grand-canyon-exposes-armageddon-nature/
my own charts as the creationist you think that i am.
I took charts and redated events.
Creationists are wrong.
The Canyon was not laid down and compressed by the last global Flood
(2370 BC carbon 14 as 20,000 years).
It was built up during the several global floods prior to Adam.
Moses wouldnt know about this since to him the fossils merely show
they existed in that order, and were buried by water. If he had
thought
You, like Moses, are utterly ignorant about geology.
Post by Elijahovah
about it then he would have realized that what came down for Noah
was only the remainder of a water canopy whose bottom had come down
many times before each time an asteroid threw dust up. This process of
impact is what creates higher land to become land plates. Further it
is also what creates layers in the land so that upon the mantle the
land plates are boyant enough to stay above ocean basins.
Thus Noah's Flood carved the Grand Canyon, it did not build it up
burying the fossils.
There were other exact global floods before it, each lasting one year,
a tectonic drop
for 5 months and rise back up in 8 months. As will occur from the 2009
Nov 6 impact
Ahhh... is this the impact that you said was to originally happen on 9
April 2009?
<http://groups.google.ca/group/talk.origins/msg/9b6cd7546bfd4bf5?hl=en>
Post by Elijahovah
for Nov 13 global mantle soup about 1-1.5 miles under all crust.
How much you want to bet that you're wrong this time, too?
Post by Elijahovah
Do not assume the Canyon had been carved from top to bottom by the one
single Flood,
if the river Euphrates existed before Noah's Flood then so did the
Colorado River exist
before it.
Don't you ever get tired of your prophecies always being wrong?

Loading...