Egyptian "image" unchanged for 475 years..

[Lars Wilson]

Loading Image...

The above compares the similar skull cap imagery for an Egyptian as seen in
an ivory inscription (likely depicting the presentation of Solomon's
Egyptian wife) compared with the national depiction of an Egyptian by Darius
at Susa some 475 years later!

The ivory inscription is believed to belong to Solomon as it was found at
Megiddo and Solmon's Egyptian wife came with the wedding gift of the city of
Gezer being conquered. The ivory would depict the conquered prisoners as
part of the wedding gift from the pharaoh. Solomon is seated on a throne
with similar description as in the Bible. Doves also are seen, suggesting
his reign is one of peace.

Lars Wilson

[JTEM]

Post by Lars Wilson
The above compares

Now I know you're a worthless crank -- the usenet
equivalent to a dog that has never been house
broken -- but what the hell are you trying to accomplish?

Seriously, dickweed, think about this. You're flooding
a group which hardly ever gets more than, say, a half
dozen normal posters a month (and that would be a
truly exceptional month), because you hope to....

What?

Get inside as many killfiles as you can?

Because that's all you can ever accomplish.

[Lars Wilson]

Post by JTEM

Post by Lars Wilson
The above compares

Now I know you're a worthless crank -- the usenet
equivalent to a dog that has never been house
broken -- but what the hell are you trying to accomplish?
Seriously, dickweed, think about this. You're flooding
a group which hardly ever gets more than, say, a half
dozen normal posters a month (and that would be a
truly exceptional month), because you hope to....
What?
Get inside as many killfiles as you can?
Because that's all you can ever accomplish.

Hi JTEM! I posted this for you! What's wrong with noting how Egyptian
imagery has been consistent? You have a problem with me for some reason,
but it's not academic.

You're AFRAID of something for some reason.

I don't care about the killfiles since that only means people are afraid of
knowledge they can't handle. Why don't YOU put me in a killfile? That
would be nice. Then at least no one who might read my posts would be
bothered with your nonsense and nonresponsiveness.

Every time you post without a response to the topic at hand underscores what
a complete idiot you truly must be. So you're only damaging your own
reputation.

I posted something of interest about Egyptian imagery over time and it
completely went over your head. Figures.

Lars

[JTEM]

Post by Lars Wilson
Hi JTEM! I

Hey, retard, you didn't answer the question. What does that
warped device you call a mind hope to accomplish with your
spamming of usenet?

Go on, freak, map it out for us. By vomitting up dozens upon
dozens of off topic articles -- all of them dependent on lies
and quote mining -- you will.....

Come on, mental case, fill in the blank.

[Lars Wilson]

Post by JTEM

Post by Lars Wilson
Hi JTEM! I

Hey, retard, you didn't answer the question. What does that
warped device you call a mind hope to accomplish with your
spamming of usenet?
Go on, freak, map it out for us. By vomitting up dozens upon
dozens of off topic articles -- all of them dependent on lies
and quote mining -- you will.....
Come on, mental case, fill in the blank.

Oh I see. Lots of reasons, but one reason is to corrupt your mind. You
see, I likely told you things you didn't know before like:

1) Manetho gives us the pharaoh of the Exodus. It was Amenhotep III.

2) The Bible mentions the altar in the middle of Egypt that Akhenaten would
build.

3) Kenyon, of course, also has archaeological dating consistent with the
Exodus occurring in 1386 BCE, with the fall of Jericho in 1346 BCE within
her dates.

Just your knowing I think I know something should irritate the hell out of
you. So it's quite rewarding....

Lars

[JTEM]

1)  Manetho gives us the pharaoh of the Exodus.  It was
Amenhotep III.

Interesting. I ask you to explain what you hope to accomplish,
and you refuse -- ONCE AGAIN -- answer. But...

You give three PURELY RELIGIOUS rationalizations for you
anti-social behavior.

Why this is so interesting is because people with faith don't
need to quote mine, they don't have misrepresent and they
certainly don't have to lie.

Take it to a religious newsgroup, where we both always knew
your spewings belonged.

Bye.

[Lars Wilson]

1) Manetho gives us the pharaoh of the Exodus. It was
Amenhotep III.

Interesting. I ask you to explain what you hope to accomplish,
and you refuse -- ONCE AGAIN -- answer. But...

You give three PURELY RELIGIOUS rationalizations for you
anti-social behavior.

Why this is so interesting is because people with faith don't
need to quote mine, they don't have misrepresent and they
certainly don't have to lie.

Take it to a religious newsgroup, where we both always knew
your spewings belonged.

Bye.


Interesting. But some things in the Bible are purely historical and
related to Egypt, so are pertinent to Egyptian history. Do yourself a favor
and just skip my posts. You're in danger of learning something and you
certainly don't want that, do you?

Bye.

Lars Wilson