Elijahovah
2009-03-29 17:22:32 UTC
A study of the vapor canopy that I am reading is implying that only
10cm of water could exist for ideal existence of the canopy. It then
discusses how the outer water vapor would crystallize into ice that
reflects 75% of solar constant energy while an ideal 25% of solar
constant heats the atmosphere below it, hot enough to keep polar air
from raining as a liquid and cool enough not to boil equatorial
oceans. This model seems to use a total complete canopy rather than
where heat from the equator moves to the poles and is release at open
ended holes in the canopy. It would seem that the rotation of the
Earth would allow for much heavier water vapor thickness at the
equator than what merely floats suspended on atmosphere over the
poles. The fact that heat is released at the poles invalildates amny
of the tight restrictions on so many models with closed up poles. The
fact that 25% solar constant radiation passes totally thru the vapor
thus reduces the C14 formation down to 25% (an C14 history gap of
11,500 years). But we already know by C14 measures that the gap is
20,000 years which is 8.3% of current C14, and longevity proves it is
at least 10% (18,000 year illusion). Thus the question posed to you
the public is this: Can the method of current C14 formation be
filtered from the 25% solar constant reaching the atmosphere for heat
down to the 8.3% formation in the atmosphere under the canopy. Can 25%
of infrared heat and visible light reach the atmosphere below the
vapor canopy but restrain an additional 16.6% of cosmic or gamma or
neutrons or whatever is making the C14 out of nitrogen below the water
vapor? Rather than all the critics post the same stuff they always
post, how about some real true intellectual people who can answer this
question of science.
10cm of water could exist for ideal existence of the canopy. It then
discusses how the outer water vapor would crystallize into ice that
reflects 75% of solar constant energy while an ideal 25% of solar
constant heats the atmosphere below it, hot enough to keep polar air
from raining as a liquid and cool enough not to boil equatorial
oceans. This model seems to use a total complete canopy rather than
where heat from the equator moves to the poles and is release at open
ended holes in the canopy. It would seem that the rotation of the
Earth would allow for much heavier water vapor thickness at the
equator than what merely floats suspended on atmosphere over the
poles. The fact that heat is released at the poles invalildates amny
of the tight restrictions on so many models with closed up poles. The
fact that 25% solar constant radiation passes totally thru the vapor
thus reduces the C14 formation down to 25% (an C14 history gap of
11,500 years). But we already know by C14 measures that the gap is
20,000 years which is 8.3% of current C14, and longevity proves it is
at least 10% (18,000 year illusion). Thus the question posed to you
the public is this: Can the method of current C14 formation be
filtered from the 25% solar constant reaching the atmosphere for heat
down to the 8.3% formation in the atmosphere under the canopy. Can 25%
of infrared heat and visible light reach the atmosphere below the
vapor canopy but restrain an additional 16.6% of cosmic or gamma or
neutrons or whatever is making the C14 out of nitrogen below the water
vapor? Rather than all the critics post the same stuff they always
post, how about some real true intellectual people who can answer this
question of science.